It is important to study governance in alternative market fields as a set of knowledge /rationalities that structures collaboration for everyday knowledge making by the participants. This article examines how two camps of advocates negotiate the definition of what composes civic organic food. A divide has emerged in the community of Beijing civic organic growers between organic agricultural producers who espouse traditional approaches, and those who rely on modern approaches. The ambiguity of the civic organic standards opens up a contingent arena for participation and negotiating boundaries between “traditional” and “scientific” organic practices outside the current “certified” version of organic food in China. This article applies the framework of boundary work to demonstrate how alternative market actors maintain boundaries between real and fraudulent organic food by engaging in debates with the rival camp. The boundaries between traditional and modern scientific organic camps are not defined by the pre-existing or by the internal properties of any given knowledge system as certain producers have claimed/presented. Instead, these situated social actors, through a set of ongoing dynamics in their daily practices, are constantly constructing and transforming the boundaries of the civic organic food supply. This is also how they attempt to gain legitimacy for their practice even though non-certified organic has never been recognized by the state. Growers’ reputation, public exposure, and consumers’ judgement on the moral compass of producers have all been influential factors in maintaining the legitimacy of civic organic in alternative food networks.
How to Cite
Civic Organic Food, Modernity, Boundary Work, China, Food Governance
Bulkeley, H., Watson, M., and Hudson, R. (2007) Modes of governing municipal waste. Environment and Planning A 39: 2733–2753.
Cody, S (2018) "Borrowing from the Rural to Help the Urban: Organic Farming Exemplars in Postsocialist China." The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology 19 (1):72-89.
Cody, S (2019) “A new consciousness of the countryside”? Elite ruralism in contemporary China,” Asian Anthropology, 18:1, 21-36.
Dupuis, E. M., and Gillon, S. (2009). Alternative modes of governance: organic as civic engagement. Agriculture & Human Values, 26(1-2), 43-56.
Fisher, D. (1990). ‘‘Boundary work and science: the relation between power and knowledge.’’ In S. Cozzens and T. Gieryn (eds.), Theories of Science in Society (pp. 98–119). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Gaziano, E. (1996). ‘‘Ecological metaphors as scientiﬁc boundary work: innovation and authority in interwar sociology and biology.’’ American Journal of Sociology 101(4): 874–907.
Goodman, D., and DuPuis E.M. (2002). Knowing food and growing food: Beyond the production/consumption debate in the sociology of agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis 42: 5–22
Goodman, R. 1980. "Taoism and ecology." Environmental Ethics 2 (1):73-80.
Gieryn, T. F. (1983). ‘‘Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists.’’ American Sociological Review 48: 781–795.
Gieryn, T. F. (1995). ‘‘Boundaries of science.’’ In S. Jasanoff, et al. (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (pp. 393–443). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility of the Line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberger, J. R. (2005). Farming on the Boundary: Organic Agriculture in Semi-Arid Kenya. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Humphrey, J., and H. Schmitz. 2000. Governance in Global Value Chains. Bridhton, UK: Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
Keller, E.F. 2002. Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development with Models, Metaphors, and Machines. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kinchy, A. J. and D. L. Kleinman (2003). ‘‘Organizing credibility: discursive and organizational orthodoxy on the borders of ecology and politics.’’ Social Studies of Science 33(6): 869–896.
Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA; Harvard University Press.
Li, X. and Loconto, A. (2019). "Mobile market and changing food governance: the world of non-certified organic food in Beijing. " Globalizations: 17-35.
Lockie, S. (2006). Capturing the sustainability agenda: Organic foods and media discourses on food scares, environment, genetic engineering, and health. Agriculture and Human Values 23: 313-323
Mellor, F. (2003). ‘‘Between fact and ﬁction: demarcating science from non-science in popular physics books.’’ Social Studies of Science 33(4): 509–538.
Porter, B. and S. R. Johnson, S. R.. 2009. Road to Heaven: Encounters With Chinese Hermits, Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint.
Renting H. , Schermer M. , Rossi A. (2012). Building food democracy: exploring civic food networks and newly emerging forms of food citizenship. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food19: 289-307.
Rofel, L. (1992). "Rethinking Modernity: Space and Factory Discipline in China." Cultural Anthropology 7(1): 93-114.
Si, Z. (2017). "Rebuilding Consumers’ Trust in Food." In Sustainable Food Futures: Multidisciplinary Solutions, edited by Jessica Duncan and Megan Bailey. New York: Routledge.
Thiers, P. (1996). The Politics of Sustainable Agriculture. Environmental Conservation, 23(2), 176-176.
Thiers, P. (2002) "From Grassroots Movement to State-Coordinated Market Strategy: The Transformation of Organic Agriculture in China." Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20 (3):357-373.
Thiers, P. (2005) "Using Global Organic markets to Pay for Ecologically Based Agricultural Development in China." Agriculture and Human Values 22 (1):3-15.
Thiers, P. (2006) "China and Global Organic Food Standards: Sovereignity Bargains and Domestic Politics." In Agricultural Standards: The Shape of the Global Food and Fiber System, edited by Jim Bingen and Lawrence Busch, 193-217. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
West China Metropolis Daily (2011). 17 April, “Peking University professor couple living in seclusion in the mountains for more than a decade, looking for the arcadia" http://history.thecover.cn/old/epaper/hxdsb/html/2011-04/17/node_2.htm, Accessed 24 March 2022.
Zhan, M (2009) Other-Worldly: Making Chinese Medicine through Transnational Frames. Durham, Duke University Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.