What is left after the pandemic? Solidarity and Reciprocity from Kayambi agroecological producers during COVID-19
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
In many places worldwide, government-imposed lockdowns during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in harshening food insecurity for urban residents. The lockdowns had contrasting effects in the rural areas of the Cayambe canton, north of Ecuador. This article shows the different forms of solidarity and reciprocity that emerged amongst consumers and producers from Kayambi communities during the pandemic. Based on interviews and ethnographic fieldwork amongst agroecological producers in 2020 and 2021, I describe their challenges in guaranteeing food security and their strategies for generating new local markets for agroecological production. At first, like peasants in other parts of the world, producers in Cayambe faced challenges in distributing food in mainstream distribution channels, a worldwide phenomenon of food surplus accumulation (de Wit 2020). Later, a shift towards increasing agrobiodiversity and decentralizing agroecological markets became the primary strategy of Kayambis. In dialogue with Altieri and Nicholls (2020), I expand on the relevance of agroecology to reconstructing agriculture in the post-covid. I show that when capitalist structures fail to guarantee peoples’ food security, other economic principles become more evident in daily life practices.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
post-COVID agriculture, political agroecology, agri-food systems, virtual ethnography, Kayambi people
Araujo, L. S. and Da Silva, A.T.R. (2022) ‘JATARISHUN: Indigenous peasant uprisings of Ecuador and Good Living; [JATARISHUN: révoltes paysannes indigènes d’Équateur et de Bien Vivre]; [JATARISHUN: Revoltas indígenas camponesas do Equador e Bem Viver]’, Caderno CRH. Available at: https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v35i0.48997.
Becker, M. (2008) Indians and Leftists in the Making of Ecuador’s Modern Indigenous Movements. Durham; London: Duke University Press.
Becker, M. (2011) Pachakutik: indigenous movements and electoral politics in Ecuador. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers (Critical currents in Latin American perspectives).
Broussard, N.H. (2019) ‘What explains gender differences in food insecurity?’, Food Policy, 83, pp. 180–194. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.01.003.
Clapp, J. and Moseley, W.G. (2020) ‘This food crisis is different: COVID-19 and the fragility of the neoliberal food security order’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(7), pp. 1393–1417. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1823838.
Colloredo-Mansfeld, R. (1999) The Native Leisure Class: Consumption and Cultural Creativity in the Andes. 1st ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Colloredo-Mansfeld, R.J. (2009) Fighting like a community: Andean civil society in an era of Indian uprisings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Desmarais, A.A., Claeys, P. and Trauger, A. (2017) Public policies for food sovereignty: Social movements and the state. London: Routledge.
Erazo, J. (2015) ‘Governing Indigenous Territories: Enacting Sovereingty in Ecuadorian Amazon’, American Anthropologist, 117(3), pp. 599–631. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12304.
Ferraro, E. (2011) ‘Trueque: An Ethnographic Account of Barter, Trade and Money in Andean Ecuador’, Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 16(1), pp. 168–184. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.19354940.2011.01129.x.
Friedemann-Sánchez, G. (2009) Assembling flowers and cultivating homes: labor and gender in Colombia. 1st pbk. ed. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Ferguson, B.G. et al. (2019) ‘Special issue editorial: What do we mean by agroecological scaling?’, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 43(7–8), pp. 722–723. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2019.1630908.
Giunta, I. (2014) ‘Food sovereignty in Ecuador: peasant struggles and the challenge of institutionalization’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(6), pp. 1201–1224. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.938057.
Gobierno Autónomo Descentralizado Intercultural y Plurinacional del Municipio Cayambe (GADIP Cayambe). (2015) Actualización del Plan de Desarrollo y Organización del Gobierno Autónomo Decentralizado Intercultural y Plurinacional Municipal de Cayambe 2015 - 2025. Cayambe: Gobierno Autónomo Descentralizado Intercultural y Plurinacional del Municipio Cayambe. https://municipiocayambe.gob.ec/images/ley_transparencia/LOTAIP/2018/literales/s/02._Plan_de_Ordenamiento_Territorial_del_Canton_Cayambe.pdf.
Gobierno Autónomo Descentralizado Intercultural y Plurinacional del Municipio Cayambe (GADIP Cayambe). (2020) Ordenanza del plan de uso y gestión del suelo del cantón Cayambe. Ordenanza. Vol. 04-CMC–2020. Cayambe: Gobierno Autónomo Descentralizado Intercultural y Plurinacional del Municipio Cayambe.
González De Molina, M. and Lopez-Garcia, D. (2021) ‘Principles for designing Agroecology-based Local (territorial) Agri-food Systems: a critical revision’, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 45(7), pp. 1050–1082. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2021.1913690.
Gualavisi, J.E.P. (2016) El crescimiento acelerado de las plantaciones florícolas en el sector de guachalá y su incidencia en las comunidades aledañas de la parte baja de la parroquia Cangahua, cantón Cayambe, provincia Pichincha, durante los últimos cinco años. Licenciatura. Universidad Central del Ecuador.
Hann, C.M. and Hart, K. (2011) Economic anthropology: history, ethnography, critique. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Hart, K. (2007) ‘Marcel Mauss: In Pursuit of the Whole. A Review Essay’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 49(2), pp. 473–485. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417507000564.
Intriago, R. et al. (2017) ‘Agroecology in Ecuador: historical processes, achievements, and challenges’, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 41(3–4), pp. 311–328. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1284174.
Korovkin, T. (2003) ‘Cut-Flower Exports, Female Labor, and Community Participation in Highland Ecuador’, Latin American Perspectives, 30(4), pp. 18–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X03030004005.
Kuhnlein, H.V. (2017) ‘Gender roles, food system biodiversity, and food security in Indigenous Peoples’ communities’, Maternal & Child Nutrition, 13(S3), p. e12529. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.12529.
Levidow, L., Sansolo, D. and Schiavinatto, M. (2022) ‘EcoSol-agroecology networks respond to the Covid-19 crisis: building an economy of proximity in Brazil’s Baixada Santista region’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 49(7), pp. 1409–1445. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2096447.
Li, T. (2014) Land’s end: capitalist relations on an indigenous frontier. Durham ; London: Duke University Press.
López-García, D. et al. (2020) 'Exploring the Contradictions of Scaling: Action Plans for Agroecological Transition in Metropolitan Environments', Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 44 (4), pp. 467–89. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2019.1649783.
López-Ridaura, S. (2002) ‘Evaluating the sustainability of complex socio-environmental systems. the MESMIS framework’, Ecological Indicators, 2(1–2), pp. 135–148. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00043-2.
López Toaquisa, J.W. (2019) Análisis de la Implementación del Sistema Participativo de Garantía para Fomentar la Producción Agroecológica en el Cantón Cayambe. Trabajo de Titulación presentado como requisito previo a la obtención del Título de Ingeniero Agrónomo. Universidad Central del Ecuador. Available at: http://www.dspace.uce.edu.ec/handle/25000/17765 (Accessed: 2 June 2023).
Lyall, A. et al. (2021) ‘Agroecology, Supply Chains, and COVID-19: Lessons on Food System Transitions from Ecuador’, Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment, 43(2), pp. 137–146.
McKay, B., Nehring, R. and Walsh-Dilley, M. (2014) ‘The “state” of food sovereignty in Latin America: political projects and alternative pathways in Venezuela, Ecuador and Bolivia’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(6), pp. 1175–1200. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.964217.
Martínez Novo, C. (2021) Undoing multiculturalism: Resource Extraction and Indigenous Rights in Ecuador. Piittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Mauss, M. (1950) The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Routledge. London. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2804090?origin=crossref (Accessed: 16 March 2023).
Mendez, V.E. et al. (eds) (2015) Agroecology: A Transdisciplinary, Participatory and Action-oriented Approach. 0 edn. CRC Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1201/b19500.
Méndez, V. et al. (2017). 'Integrating Agroecology and Participatory Action Research (PAR): Lessons from Central America.' Sustainability 9 (5), pp. 705. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050705.
Mier Y Terán Giménez Cacho, M. et al. (2018) ‘Bringing agroecology to scale: key drivers and emblematic cases’, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 42(6), pp. 637–665. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2018.1443313.
Montenegro de Wit, M. (2021) ‘What grows from a pandemic? Toward an abolitionist agroecology’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 48(1), pp. 99–136. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1854741.
Murra, J. (2013) Formations économiques et politiques du monde andien.pdf. 1st ed. Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.
Peña, K. (2017) ‘State-led grassroots participation and Ecuador’s Land Law’, in A.A. Desmarais, P. Claeys, and A. Trauger (eds) Public policies for food sovereignty: social movements and the state. London : New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 19–36.
Polanyi, K. (1977) The Livelihood of Man. Harry W. Pearson. New York: Academic Press (Studies in social discontinuity).
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017) Matters of care: speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (Posthumanities, 41).
Quijano, A. (2000) ‘Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America’, Nepantla: Views from South, pp. 533–579.
Quijano, A. (2020) Cuestiones y horizontes: de la dependencia histórico-estructural a la colonialidad/descolonialidad del poder: antología esencial. Primera edición. Buenos Aires: CLACSO (Colección Antologías).
Requelme, N. et al. (2019) Mujeres en resistencia y territorios agroecologicos - Construcción participativa de la Ordenanza de uso de espacios públicos para la comercialización de productos sanos en ferias agroecológicas-Cayambe. 1st edn. Cuenca: Abya Yala y Universidad Politecnica Salesiana.
Salomon, F. (1986) Native lords of Quito in the age of the Incas: the political economy of north-Andean chiefdoms. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press (Cambridge studies in social anthropology, no. 59).
Schulte-Tenckhoff, I. (2015) “Homo cooperans: lessons from anthropology”. Customizing a patchwork quilt: consolidating co-operative studies within the university world: in memoriam professor Ian MacPherson. pp. 27-33. Seinäjoki: University of Helsinki Ruralia Institute.
Radcliffe, S.A. (2015) Dilemmas of difference: indigenous women and the limits of postcolonial development policy. Duke University Press: Durham.
Rivera-Ferre, M.G. (2018) ‘The resignification process of Agroecology: Competing narratives from governments, civil society and intergovernmental organizations’, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 42(6), pp. 666–685. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2018.1437498.
Tutillo, G. (2010) El impacto de la floricultura en la vida de las y los trabajadores jóvenes de las comunidades la Josefina y Cuniburo de la parroquia de Cangahua - Cayambe. Maestría en Ciencias Sociales. FLACSO Ecuador. Available at: https://repositorio.flacsoandes.edu.ec/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10469/2401/TFLACSO-2010GT.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y (Accessed: 17 March 2023).
Wezel, A. et al. (2009) ‘Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review’, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29(4), pp. 503–515. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009004.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b67b2/b67b296c4d3b028c918eaf7bf864d9ab589a7b44" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.