Food Movements, Resistance, and new digital repertoires in (post-)pandemic times
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
While the Covid-19 pandemic demonstrated the vulnerability of the global food system, new resilient repertoires of collective action also showed how to overcome the multiple dimensions of this crisis. Food movements played an important role in creating innovative alternatives for a more just food system. In Germany, the pandemic affected and continues to affect agri-food relations. This article argues that digital communication was an important tool to connect people for purposes beyond sharing food and supporting food-related needs. Social media became a virtual platform for social mobilisation and innovation around food alternatives during and in a (post-) pandemic world. Two relevant actors in the German food mobilisation were the protest campaign Wir haben es satt! and the food movement Slow Food Germany. The work presented here is based on digital ethnographies and an analysis of documents from the period 2020-2022. The analysis focuses on how these two movements dealt with the crisis scenario, in relation to three classic levels of protest and social movement research: (1) actor level; (2) action level; and (3) transformation level. The comparison shows that both movements developed innovative digital and hybrid repertoires of collective action, and fostered coalitions between actors fighting for a socio-ecological transformation of the food system.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Food Movements, solidarity, repertoires of action, digital activism, Covid-19-Pandemic
Allen P (2010) Realizing justice in local food systems. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3(2): 295–308.
Baines D and Sharma N (2002) Migrant workers as non-citizens: The case against citizenship as a social policy concept. Studies in Political Economy 69(1). Taylor & Francis: 75–107.
Biesalski HK (2021) Ernährungsarmut bei Kindern–Ursachen, Folgen, COVID-19. Aktuelle Ernährungsmedizin 46(05): 317–332.
Birner R, Linseisen J, Arens-Azevêdo U, et al. (2023) Ernährungsarmut unter Pandemiebedingungen. Berichte über Landwirtschaft-Zeitschrift für Agrarpolitik und Landwirtschaft. Epub ahead of print 2023.
Brückner M, Cajić S and Bauhardt C (2021) Reflection: Food as pleasure or pressure? The care politics of the pandemic. Food and Foodways 29(3): 289–298.
Bundestag (2022) Regierung: Gesunde Ernährung mit Regelbedarf möglich. Parlamentsnachrichten Deutscher Bundestag, hib 570/2022.
Butler J (1999) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge. Butler J (2015) Notes toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. harvard university Press.
Calderón F and Castells M (2020) The New Latin America (tran. R McGlazer). Cambridge ; Medford, MA: Polity Press.
Castañeda Salgado MP (2010) Etnografía feminista. In: Investigación Feminista. Epistemología, Metodología y Representaciones Sociales. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, pp. 217–238. Available at: http://biblioteca.clacso.edu.ar/Mexico/ceiich- unam/20170428032751/pdf_1307.pdf.
Castells M (2007) Communication, Power and Counter-Power in the Network Society. 2007. Available at: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/46/35.
Castells M (2010) The Power of Identity. 2nd ed., with a new preface. The information age: economy, society, and culture. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Castells M (2017) Redes de Indignação e Esperança: Movimentos Sociais Na Era Da Internet. Editora Schwarcz-Companhia das Letras.
Chadwick A (2007) Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity. Political Communication 24(3). Taylor & Francis: 283–301.
Conway J (2008) Geographies of Transnational Feminisms: The Politics of Place and Scale in the World March of Women. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 15(2): 207–231.
Counihan C and Siniscalchi V (2013) Food Activism: Agency, Democracy and Economy. Bloomsbury Publishing.
de Suremain C-É (2019) From Multi-Sited Ethnography to Food Heritage: What Theoretical and Methodological Challenges for Anthropology? Revista del CESLA: International Latin American Studies Review (24): 7–32.
Delanty G (2021) Introduction: The pandemic in historical and global context. In: Delanty G (ed.)Pandemics, Politics, and Society. De Gruyter, pp. 1–22.
Della Porta D (2021) Progressive social movements, democracy and the pandemic. In: Delanty G (ed.) Pandemics, Politics, and Society. De Gruyter, pp. 209–226.
DESTATIS Statistisches Bundesamt (2022) Preisentwicklung ausgewählter Waren und Dienstleistungen, Mai 2022. 14/06/2022 ed. Berlin: Statistisches Bundesamt. Available at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Wirtschaft/Preise/Verbraucherpreisindex/Tabellen/to p20.html.
FAO (2021) The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2021. Transforming food systems for food security, improved nutrition and affordable healthy diets for all. Rome: FAO.
Feichtinger E (1996) Armut und Ernährung: Literaturanalyse unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Konsequenzen für Ernährungs-und Gesundheitsstatus und der Ernährungsweise in der Armut. WZB Discussion Paper.
Fladvad B (2018) Die Food Movements und ihre Forderungen: zur politischen Dimension alternativer Ernährungsgeographien. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie 62(3–4): 201–216.
Fraser N (2017) A Triple Movement? Parsing the Politics of Crisis after Polanyi. In: Burchardt M and Kirn G (eds) Beyond Neoliberalism: Social Analysis after 1989. Approaches to Social Inequality and Difference. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 29–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45590-7_3 (accessed 29 April 2023).
Friedmann H (1982) The political economy of food: the rise and fall of the postwar international food order. American journal of sociology 88: S248–S286.
Friedmann H (1993) The political economy of food: a global crisis. New left review (197): 29–57.
Fuchs C (2022) Social Media, Alienation, and the Public Sphere. In: The Social Media Debate. Routledge, pp. 53–76.
Gibson-Graham JK (2008) Diverse economies: performative practices forother worlds’. Progress in human geography 32(5). SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England: 613–632.
Goodman D, DuPuis EM, Goodman MK, et al. (2012) Alternative food networks : knowledge, practice, and politics. Routledge studies of gastronomy, food and drink. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York: Routledge.
Guthman J (2008) Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California. Geoforum 39(3). Elsevier: 1171–1183.
Guthman J (2011) “If They Only Knew”. The Unbearable Whiteness of Alternative Food. In: Cultivating Food Justice Race, Class, and Sustainability. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 263–281.
Hidayah I, Rohmah N and Saifuddin M (2021) Effectiveness of Digital Platforms as Food and Beverage Marketing Media During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Airlangga J. Innov. Manag 2(2).
Hine C (2000) Virtual Ethnography. Sage.
Holt Giménez E and Shattuck A (2011) Food crises, food regimes and food movements: rumblings of reform or tides of transformation? The Journal of peasant studies 38(1): 109–144.
Holt-Gimenez E and Patel R (2012) Food Rebellions: Crisis and the Hunger for Justice. Food First Books.
Jarosz L (2014) Comparing food security and food sovereignty discourses. Dialogues in Human Geography 4(2): 168–181.
Kalix Garcia T (2023) Good, clean, and fair food for all: Slow Food role in safeguarding food heritage in Brazil and Germany. PhD Thesis. Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain.
Kavada A (2022) 19: Creating a Hyperlocal Infrastructure of Care: COVID-19 Mutual Aid Groups in the UK. In: Social Movements and Politics During COVID-19. Bristol, UK: Bristol University Press, pp. 147–154. Available at: https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/book/9781529217254/ch019.xml.
Kuckartz U and Rädiker S (2022) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung. Grundlagentexte Methoden. Basel: Beltz Juventa. Available at: https://books.google.de/books?id=sdyfzQEACAAJ.
Küppers C (2021) How to harvest in a pandemic?: the German media coverage of migrant workers and harvesting in the context of the Covid-19 crisis in 2020. Food for Justice Working Paper Series (5). Food for Justice Working Paper Series. Epub ahead of print 2021.
La Via Campesina (n.d.) Food Sovereignty : Via Campesina. Available at: https://viacampesina.org/en/what-are-we-fighting-for/food-sovereignty-and-trade/ (accessed 12 September 2023).
Lewis T (2018) Digital food: from paddock to platform. Communication Research and Practice 4(3). Taylor & Francis: 212–228.
Mayer MDC, Stern V and Daphi P (2021) Soziale Bewegungen in Zeiten von Covid-19 zwischen Anpassung, Innovation und Brüchen. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 34(2): 203–217.
Mayring P (2022) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. 13., überarbeitete Auflage. Weinheim Basel: Beltz.
Meinecke M, Motta R, Neuber M, et al. (2021) Politische Ernährung: Mobilisierung, Konsumverhalten und Motive von Teilnehmer* innen der Wir haben es satt!-Demonstration 2020. Epub ahead of print 2021.
Milan S (2015) From social movements to cloud protesting: the evolution of collective identity. Information, Communication & Society 18(8): 887–900.
Motta R (2021a) Food for Justice: Power, Politics and Food Inequalities in a Bioeconomy. Preliminary Research Program. Food for Justice Working Paper Series. Berlin: Refubium FU Berlin.
Motta R (2021b) Social movements as agents of change: Fighting intersectional food inequalities, building food as webs of life. The Sociological Review 69(3): 603–625.
Motta R (2022) Wir haben es satt!: Politisch-ökologische Ernährungskoalition. Berliner Blätter 86: 71– 88.
Norris P (2001) Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge university press.
Open Society F (2020) COVID-19, AGRI-FOOD SYSTEMS, AND MIGRANT LABOUR. Open Society Foundations
Patel R (2007) Stuffed and starved: markets. Power and the Hidden Battle for the World Food System (Black Inc, Carlton, VIC, Australia). Epub ahead of print 2007.
Pfeiffer S (2014) Die Verdrängte Realität: Ernährungsarmut in Deutschland: Hunger in Der Überflussgesellschaft. Springer-Verlag.
Pink S, Ard, egrave, et al. (2016) Digital materiality. In: Pink S, Ard, egrave, et al. (eds) Digital Materialities: Design and Anthropology. 1st ed. London: Bloomsbury Academic, pp. 1–26. Available at: http://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/digital-materialities-design-and- anthropology/ch1-digital-materiality/ (accessed 25 November 2016).
Postill J and Pink S (2012) Social Media Ethnography: The Digital Researcher in a Messy Web. Media International Australia 145(1): 123–134.
Riches G and Silvasti T (2014) First World Hunger Revisited: Food Charity or the Right to Food? Springer.
Rohlinger DA and Corrigall-Brown C (2018) Social Movements and Mass Media in a Global Context.
McCammon HJ, Snow DA, Soule SA, et al. (eds). Chichester, UK: 131–147.
Sanderson Bellamy A, Furness E, Nicol P, et al. (2021) Shaping more resilient and just food systems: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic. Ambio 50. Springer: 782–793.
Selander L and Jarvenpaa SL (2016) Digital action repertoires and transforming a social movement organization. mis Quarterly 40(2): 331–352.
Siniscalchi V (2013) Environment, regulation and the moral economy of food in the Slow Food movement. Journal of Political Ecology 20(1).
Slocum R (2007) Whiteness, space and alternative food practice. Geoforum 38(3): 520–533. Tilly C (1977) From Mobilization to Revolution. University of Michigan.
Touraine A (1985) An introduction to the study of social movements. Social research. JSTOR: 749– 787.
Van Dyke N and Amos B (2017) Social movement coalitions: Formation, longevity, and success. Sociology Compass 11(7).
Van Laer J and Van Aelst P (2013) Cyber-protest and civil society: the Internet and action repertoires in social movements. In: Handbook of Internet Crime. Willan, pp. 230–254.
Von Normann K (2011) Ernährungsarmut und „Tafelarbeit “in Deutschland. Distributionspolitische Hintergründe und nonprofit-basierte Lösungsstrategien. Tafeln in Deutschland: Aspekte einer sozialen Bewegung zwischen Nahrungsmittelumverteilung und Armutsintervention: 91–112.
Wichterich C (2002) Sichere Lebensgrundlagen statt effizienterer Naturbeherrschung–das Konzept nachhaltige Entwicklung aus feministischer Sicht. einsprüche 13 Christoph Görg: 73.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.