Localised experimentalist governance A framework for understanding the political dimensions of Alternative Food Networks

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published 17-08-2025
Sara Chinaglia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2336-2659

Jessica Duncun

Abstract

There is widespread agreement on the need to radically transform food systems. Some  scholars have argued that such transformations demand an engagement with 'the political': that is, with the competing understandings, values, and ambitions that mark society. However, it remains unclear how networks of actors govern processes in ways that make space for 'the political' without undermining collective action. In this paper, we explore the role of 'the political' in the internal governance of Alternative Food Networks (AFNs) by advancing a locally-adapted framework for experimentalist governance. Taking the case of Campi Aperti, an AFN in Bologna, Italy, we show how the internal governance structures of AFNs, when shaped by elements of a localised  approach to experimentalist governance, can facilitate engagement with 'the political' by navigating power dynamics and strategic uncertainties that influence their capacity for transformative change. In turn, our framework and analysis make visible the political potential of Campi Aperti as facilitated through its internal governance. Our findings illustrate how governance innovations emerge predominantly inside the network but struggle to receive support from other actors, notably public policy actors like the Municipality and regional authority. In this way, we contribute to understanding the internal governance of AFNs and respond to calls for deeper inquiry into their political dimensions.

How to Cite

Chinaglia, S. and Duncun, J. (2025) “Localised experimentalist governance: A framework for understanding the political dimensions of Alternative Food Networks”, The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 31(1), pp. 181–196. doi:10.48416/ijsaf.v31i1.652.
Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
Aguglia L (2009) La filiera corta: una opportunità per agricoltori e consumatori. Epub ahead of print 2009.
Ansell C, Sørensen E and Torfing J (2025) Theorizing the political dimension of collaborative governance. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance: gvaf007.
Ansell, C., and J. Torfing (eds.). (2022) Handbook on Theories of Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Blythe J, Silver J, Evans L, et al. (2018) The Dark Side of Transformation: Latent Risks in Contemporary Sustainability Discourse. Antipode 50(5): 1206–1223.
Bos JJ and Brown RR (2012) Governance experimentation and factors of success in socio-technical transitions in the urban water sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79(7): 1340–1353.
Bradley, K. and H. Herrera (2016) Decolonizing food justice: naming, resisting, and researching colonizing forces in the movement. Antipode 48(1): 97-114.
De Búrca G, Keohane RO and Sabel C (2014) Global Experimentalist Governance. British Journal of Political Science 44(3): 477–486.
Denscombe M (2010) The Good Research Guide: For Small-Scale Social Research Projects. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Duncan J and Claeys P (2018) Politicizing food security governance through participation: opportunities and opposition. Food Security 10(6): 1411–1424.
Duncan J and Pascucci S (2017) Mapping the Organisational Forms of Networks of Alternative Food Networks: Implications for Transition: Mapping the organisational forms of AFNs. Sociologia Ruralis 57(3): 316–339.
Duncan J, DeClerck F, Báldi A, et al. (2022) Democratic directionality for transformative food systems research. Nature Food 3(3). Nature Publishing Group: 183–186.
DuPuis EM and Goodman D (2005) Should we go 'home' to eat?: toward a reflexive politics of localism. Journal of Rural Studies 21(3): 359–371.
European Commission. Joint Research Centre. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. (2013) Short Food Supply Chains and Local Food Systems in the EU: A State of Play of Their Socio Economic Characteristics. LU: Publications Office. Available at: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2791/88784 (accessed 2 January 2023).
Fawcett, P., & Marsh, D. (2014). Depoliticisation, governance and political participation. Policy & Politics, 42(2), 171-188.
Feindt PH, Schwindenhammer S and Tosun J (2021) Politicization, Depoliticization and Policy Change: A Comparative Theoretical Perspective on Agri-food Policy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 23(5–6): 509–525.
Galisai T, Olmeo G and Usai G (2009) I farmers’ markets: aspetti normativi e caratterizzazione dei consumatori. Epub ahead of print 2009.
Guthman, J. 2008. Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California. Geoforum 39(3): 1171-1183
Home R and Nelson E (2015) The role of participatory guarantee systems for food security. Feeding the people: Agroecology for nourishing the world and transforming the agri-food system. IFAOM EU Group: 26–29.
Kimbell, L. and Vesnić-Alujević, L. (2020) After the toolkit: anticipatory logics and the future of government. Policy Des. Pract. 3, 95–108.
Layder D (1993) New strategies in social research: An introduction and guide. (No Title). Epub ahead of print 1993.
Marchart, O. (2018) Thinking antagonism: political ontology after Laclau. Edinburgh University Press, 2018.
Martindale L (2021) 'I will know it when I taste it': trust, food materialities and social media in Chinese alternative food networks. Agriculture and Human Values 38(2): 365–380.
Mason J (1996) Qualitative Researching. Qualitative researching. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
McAlpine CA, Seabrook LM, Ryan JG, et al. (2015) Transformational change: creating a safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 20(1): art56.
Moragues-Faus, A. (2017). Emancipatory or neoliberal food politics? Exploring the ‘politics of collectivity’ of buying groups in the search for egalitarian food democracies. Antipode, 49(2), 455–476.
Mouffe C (2002) Politics and passions: introduction. Philosophy & Social Criticism 28(6). SAGE Publications Ltd: 615–616.
Mouffe, C. On the political. (Routledge, 2005).
Rancière, J. (1992). Politics, Identification, and Subjectivizatio. In The identity in question (pp. 58–64). October.
Rossi A, Bui S and Marsden T (2019) Redefining power relations in agrifood systems. Journal of Rural Studies 68: 147–158.
Sabel CF and Zeitlin J (2007) Learning from Difference: The New Architecture of Experimentalist Governance in the European Union.: 70.
Sabel C, O'Donnell R and O'Connell L (2019) Self Organization under Deliberate Direction: Irish Dairy and the Possibilities of a New Climate Change Regime.: 44.
Sabel CF and Zeitlin J (2012) Experimentalist Governance. Oxford University Press. Available at: http://oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560530.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199560530-e-12 (accessed October 28 2021).
Sage C (2003) Social embeddedness and relations of regard: alternative ‘good food’ networks in south-west Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies 19(1). International Perspectives on Alternative Agro-Food Networks: Quality, Embeddedness, Bio-Politics: 47–60.
Sage C (2014) The Transition Movement and Food Sovereignty: From Local Resilience to Global Engagement in Food System Transformation. Journal of Consumer Culture 14: 254–275.
Silverman D (2018) Doing Qualitative Research.

Sonnino R and Marsden T (2006) Beyond the divide: rethinking relationships between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography 6(2): 181–199.
Sørensen E (2014) Conflict as driver of pluricentric coordination. Planning Theory 13(2). Sage Publications, Ltd.: 152–169.
Swyngedouw E (2005) Governance Innovation and the Citizen: The Janus Face of Governance-beyond-the-State. Urban Studies 42(11): 1991–2006.
Swyngedouw E (2009) The Antinomies of the Postpolitical City: In Search of a Democratic Politics of Environmental Production. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33(3): 601–620.
Thorsøe M and Kjeldsen C (2016) The Constitution of Trust: Function, Configuration and Generation of Trust in Alternative Food Networks. Sociologia Ruralis 56(2): 157–175.
Tregear A (2011) Progressing knowledge in alternative and local food networks: Critical reflections and a research agenda. Journal of Rural Studies 27(4). Subjecting the Objective– Participation, Sustainability and Agroecological Research: 419–430.
Turner JA, Horita A, Fielke S, et al. (2020) Revealing power dynamics and staging conflicts in agricultural system transitions: Case studies of innovation platforms in New Zealand. Journal of Rural Studies 76: 152–162.
Watts D, Ilbery B and Maye D (2005) Making Reconnections in Agro-Food Geography: Alternative Systems of Food Provision. Progress in Human Geography - PROG HUM GEOGR 29: 22–40.
Webb, P., Benton, T.G., Beddington, J. et al. (2020) The urgency of food system transformation is now irrefutable. Nat Food 1, 584–585.
Wood M and Flinders M (2014) Rethinking depoliticisation: Beyond the governmental. Policy & Politics 42.
Yin RK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. sage.
Section
Food System Transformation, Politicisation and Depoliticisation

How to Cite

Chinaglia, S. and Duncun, J. (2025) “Localised experimentalist governance: A framework for understanding the political dimensions of Alternative Food Networks”, The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 31(1), pp. 181–196. doi:10.48416/ijsaf.v31i1.652.