Eating Well, Eating Fare: Farm Animal Welfare in France
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Although the welfare of farm animals is increasingly being incorporated into notions of quality within the food chain, this is a rarely an explicit component. Rather, it is bundled in with a number of related environmental, health and territorial ‘goods’ to a create a composite construction of product quality that differentially conceals and makes visible the animal life, and its setting. Drawing upon recent research conducted in France, this paper examines the manner in which these bundled ‘goods’ are assembled during the commercialisation process of animal products and considers the place of animal welfare within that bundling. As a strategy of market segmentation, the differential concealment and valorisation of animal lives within the process of commercialisation, reveals, we argue, food chain actors’ perception of an enduring tension in contemporary social attitudes towards to farm animals and their transformation into meat products which, following Elias, demonstrates not only an ethical pluralism but also a necessary distanciation that issues of welfare are having to confront. As such, the paper identifies the shifting discourses of ‘quality’ that are assembled around the product and the intended meanings as communicated to consumers.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Blondeau, C. (2002) La boucherie : un lieu d’innocence ?, ethnographiques.org (2) on-line publication located at: http://www.ethnographiques.org/2002/Blondeau.html, consulted 12th January 2007.
Bourdieu, P. (1979) Distinction: critique sociale du jugement. Paris, Editions du Minuit.
British Meat (1987) ‘Commissioners urge product improvement’. Meat and Livestock Commission Press Release 4. Milton Keynes, MLC.
Buller H. and C. Cesar (2008) Retailing animal welfare in France In: E. Roe. and M. Higgin (eds) The current and potential market for welfare-friendly food: retailing and supply chain practices. A cross-comparative study over six European countries. Welfare Quality Report no 6. Cardiff University.
Buller, H. and Morris C. (2003) Farm animal welfare: a new repertoire of nature/society relations or modernism re-embedded ? Sociologia Ruralis, 43 (3) pp. 216-237.
Buller, H. And Morris, C. (2007) Beasts of a Different Burden: Agricultural Sustainability and Farm Animals In Seymour, Fish, Watkins, Steven (eds) Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Sustainable Farmland Management, Wallingford, CABI.
Cazes-Valette (2004) Le rapport a la viande chez le mangeur francais contemporain. Rapport d’Etude Sociologique, Toulouse, ESC.
Elias, N. (1939) The Civilizing Process (1994 Edition), Oxford, Blackwell. Eurobarometer (2005) Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farm animals.
Eurobarometer Report 229. Brussels, Eurobarometer.
Fearnley-Whittingstall, H. (2004) The River Cottage Meat Book. London, Hodder and Stoughton.
Fiddes, N. (1991) Meat: a natural symbol. London, Routledge.
Fischler, C. (2001). L’Homnivore. Paris, Poches Odile Jacob.
Glandières, A. (2003) Les consommateurs de viande biologique Report to the Chambre Régionale d’Agriculture de Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse.
Goody, J. (1982) Cooking, Cuisine and Class, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Gopnik, A. (2000) Paris to the Moon, New York, Random House.
Hinrichs, C. (2003) The practice and politics of food system localization. Journal of Rural Studies 19 (1), 33-45.
Kjaernes, U., M. Miele and J. Roex (2007) Attitudes of consumers, retailers and producers to farm animal welfare. Welfare Quality Report no 2. Cardiff, University of Cardiff.
Lafon, M. (2005) Le bien etre animal est mort… Vive le bien traitance. Dépéche Veterinaire 879, pp. 31-33.
Mechin, C. (1992) Betes a manger: usages alimentaires des francais. Nancy, Presses universitaires de Nancy.
Mennell, S. (1985) All Manners of Food: Eating and Taste in England and France from the Middle Ages, Oxford, Blackwell.
Morris, C and Buller, H. (2003) The local food sector: a preliminary assessment of its impact in Gloucestershire. British Food Journal 105 (8) pp. 559-566.
Murcott, A, (2003) Food and Culture. In P. Belton and T. Belton (eds) Food Science and Society, New York, Springer, 2003 pp. 21-47.
Poulain, J-P. et al (2007) France. In A. Evans and M. Miele (eds) Consumers’ views about farm animal welfare. Welfare Quality Report no 4. Cardiff, University of Cardiff, pp. 323-370.
Regnier, F., A. Lhuissier and S. Gojard (2006) Sociologie de l’alimentation. Paris, La Decouverte.
Singer, P. And J. Mason (2006) The ethics of what we eat, New York, Rodale. The Times (2007) Thought for Food: Britain benefits from an open-minded approach to purchasing produce. The Times Leader. 4th January 2007, p. 18.
Vasseur, E., A-C Dockes and F. Kling-Eveillard (2005) France: Report 1.3. Welfare Quality Project. Paris, French Livestock Institute.
Vialles, N. (1988) La viande ou la bête, Terrain, 10 ‘Des hommes et des bêtes’ (avril 1988) pp. 86-96 : available on line at
http://terrain.revues.org/document2932.html. Consulted the 17 May 2007.
Vialles, N. (1999) La mort a bonne distance. Sciences Humaines HS 23, pp. 34-37.
Vialles, N. (2007) Des invarients de la relation alimentaire. In J-P Poulain (ed) L’homme, le mangeur, l’animal. Qui nourrit l’autre ? Editions Ocha, Paris Wiesner-Bourgeois, C. (2004) quoted in ‘La Viande et la Canteen’, report of a workshop in December 2004 on meat consumption in school canteens, La Terre de Chez Nous. 4 December 2004. available on-line at
www.laterredecheznous.com accessed the 7th February 2007
Winter, M. (2003) Embeddedness, the new food economy and defensive localism. Journal of Rural Studies 19 (1), 23-32.
CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.