An actor-network approach is used to analyse a local organic agriculture network in Northern Thailand. This network is centred around local organic standards developed by discourse coalitions with similar social concerns about organic agriculture. Local standards were developed through the translation of existing, international standards into production processes directly addressing the social concerns by discourse coalitions of farmers, retailers, and consumers, leading to the establishment of the Northern Organic Standards Organization (NOSO). The standards are communicated symbolically to consumers through labels and logos. When applying for national recognition as an organic certifying body through the National Bureau of Agricultural Commodity and Food Standards (ACFS) of Thailand, NOSO found that local standards must comply in total to all International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) standards for accreditation. The impasses between local concerns and international policies led to what I call a reflexive translation of the appropriateness of international accreditation for the local organic certifying body, resulting in new policies supporting local concerns addressed by the existing body of local organic standards.
How to Cite
AGRAWAL, A. (2005) Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
ANAN GANJANAPAN (2000) Local Control of Land and Forest: Cultural Dimensions of Resource Management in
Northern Thailand. Chiang Mai: regional Center for Social Science and Sustainable Development.
BECK, U. (1994) the reinvention of politics, in: U. BECK, A. GIDDENS and S. LASH (eds) Reflexive Modernization:
Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
CALLON, M. (1991) techno-economic networks and irreversibility, in: J. LAW (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters:
Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, London: routledge.
CALLON, M. (2005) actor-network theory: the market test, in: J. LAW and J. HASSARD (eds) Actor Network
Theory and After, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
CHOMCHUAN BOONRAHONG, C. (2008) Institute of Sustainable Agricultural Communities under the Northnet
Foundation, Working Paper. Chiang Mai: Institute of Sustainable agricultural Communities.
EISCHEN, E., PONNARONG PRASERTSRI and SUKANYA SIRIKERATIKUL, S. (2006) thailand organic products: thailand's
organic outlook 2006, in: R. NICELY (ed.) Bangkok: Global Agricultural Information Network, Bangkok:
USDa Foreign agricultural Service.
ELLIS, W., VITOON PANYAKUL, VILDOZO, D. and KASTERINE, D.A. (2006) Strengthening the Export Capacity of
Thailand’s Organic Agriculture: Final Report. Geneva: asia trust Fund Project and the International trade
FAO (FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION) (2001) World Markets for Organic Fruit and Vegetables: Opportunities
for Developing Countries in the Production and Export of Organic Horticultural Products. rome:
International trade Centre of the technical Centre for agricultural and rural Cooperation.
FORSYTH, T. (2003) Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science. London: routledge.
GOODMAN, D. and WATTS, M. (eds) (1997) Globalising Food: Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring. London:
GUPTA, A. (1998) Postcolonial Developments: Agriculture in the Making of Modern India. Durham, NC: Duke
HAJER, M. (1993) Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: the case of acid rain in Britain,
in: F. FISCHER and J. FORESTER (ed.) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
HAJER, M. (2005) Coalitions, practices and meaning in environmental politics: from acid rain to BSe, in:
D.R. HOWARTH and J. TORFING (eds) Discourse Theory In European Politics: Identity, Policy and Governance,
Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
HAJER, M. (2006) the living institutions of the eU: analysing governance as performance, Perspectives on
European Politics and Society, 7(1), pp. 41–55.
HAJER, M. and LAW, D. (2006) Ordering through discourse, in: M. MORAN, M. REIN and R.E. GOODIN (eds)
The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
HIRSCH, P. (1997) Seeing Forests for Trees: Environment and Environmentalism in Thailand. Chiang Mai: Silkworm
HIRSCHMAN, A.O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.
HUMPHREY, J. and MEMEDOVIC, O. (2006) Global Value Chains in the Agrifood Sector. Vienna: United Nations
Industrial Development Organization.
ITC (INTERNATIONAL TRADE CENTRE) (2008) Country Profile: Thailand. Geneva: International trade Centre.
JICA (JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY) (2002) Capacity Building of Local Authorities in Thailand,
Bangkok: Department of Local administration.
LASH, S. (1994) reflexivity and its doubles: structures, aesthetics, community, in: U. BECK, A. GIDDENS and
S. LASH (ed.) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford:
Stanford University Press.
LATOUR, B. (1991) technology is society made durable, in: J. LAW (ed.) A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on
Power, Technology and Domination, London: routledge.
LI, T. (2007) The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham, NC: Duke
MARSDEN, T. and MURDOCH, J. (eds) (2006) Between the Local and the Global: Confronting Complexity in the
Contemporary Agri-food Sector. amsterdam: elsevier JaI.
MCKINNON, J. (2003) Community culture: strengthening persistence to empowered resistance, in: C.O.
DELANG (ed.) Living at the Edge of Thai Society: The Karen in the Highlands of Northern Thailand, London:
RAIKES, P., JENSEN, M.F. and PONTE, S. (2000) Global commodity chain analysis and the French filière
approach: comparison and critique, Economy and Society, 29(3), pp. 390–417.
RAYNOLDS, L.T. (2004) the globalization of organic agro-food networks, World Development, 32(5), pp. 725–
RIGG, J. (1997) Southeast Asia: The Human Landscape of Modernization and Development. London: routledge.
ROITNER-SCHOBESBERGER, B. (2008) Consumer's perception of organic foods in Bangkok, thailand, Food Policy,
33(2), pp. 112–121.
RUNDGREN, G. (2003) the Organic Certification Directory, Organic Standard, published online
SCOTT, J.C. (1986) Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, Ct: yale University
SHEPARD, A. (2006) Quality and Safety in the Traditional Horticultural Marketing Chains of Asia, rome: FaO.
THIPRAD MANEELERT (1999) The Northern Agriculture Standard. Chiang Mai: thai research Fund.
THRIFT, N.J. (1996) Spatial Formations. London: Sage Publications.
VANDERGEEST, P. (2006) Natural Markets: Remaking Food and Agriculture in Southeast Asia. Published online
VITOON PANYAKUL (2001) Organic Agriculture in Thailand. Prresented at Seminar on Production and export
of Organic Fruit and Vegetables in asia. Bangkok, 3–5 November 2003.
VITOON PANYAKUL (2002) The Role of Agricultural and Rural Development in Thailand. Bangkok: United
Nations economic and Social Commission for asia and the Pacific (eSCaP). Published online
VITOON PANYAKUL (2008) Behind the smile of the thai organic sector, Organic Standard, 89.
WHATMORE, S. and THORNE, L. (1997) Nourishing networks: alternative geographies of food, in: D. GOODMAN
and M. WATTS (eds) Globalising Food: Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring, London:
WYATT, B. (2010) Local Alternative Agriculture and Neoliberal Agenda: Regulations of Organic Vegetable Commodity
Networks in Chiang Mai Province, Northern Thailand. Chiang Mai: Chiang Mai University.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.