Collective Farmers’ Marketing Initiatives in Europe: Diversity, Contextuality and Dynamics
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
Collective action by farmers has played an important role in the history of European agriculture. During the twentieth century, the foundation of agricultural marketing co-operatives contributed in many countries to better market access, increased farm incomes and rural employment. However, European agriculture is facing a range of new challenges nowadays. Farmers have increasingly lost control over supply chains, due to globalization processes and the growing power of retailers, and they are also confronted with a general decline and reorientation of policy support. At the same time, there is a need to respond to changing demands for food safety, quality and an attractive countryside. Against this background, a range of new types of collective farmers’ marketing initiatives is emerging across Europe by which farmers in coalition with other categories of societal actors aim to find answers for the challenges they are currently facing. Based on the outcomes of the European COFAMI research project, this article explores the diversity of strategies that characterize these newly emerging collective marketing strategies and the different types of social network relations that they are generating. Also, it outlines some main methodological principles for studying the dynamics and operation of new collective marketing initiatives.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Barney, J.B. (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99–120.
Chambe rs, R. and Conway, G. (1992) Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. IDS Discussion Paper No. 296. Brighton: IDS.
Dijk, G. van (1997), Implementing the sixth reason for co-operation, in: J. Nilsson and G. van Dijk (eds) Strategies and Structures in the Agro-Food Industries, Assen: Van Gorcum, pp. 94–110.
Emery, M. and Flora, C. (2006) Spiraling-up: mapping community transformation with community capitals framework, Community Development, 37(1), pp. 19–35.
European Commission (2010) The CAP towards 2020: Meeting the Food, Natural Resources and Territorial Challenges of the Future, COM(2010) 672 final. Brussels: European Commission. Published online
Fried land, W.H. (2004) Agrifood globalization and commodity systems, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 12(1), pp. 17–28.
Goodwin, M. (2003) Five Kinds of Capital: Useful Concepts for Sustainable Development, Global Development and Environment Institute Working Paper No. 03-07. Medford, MA: Tufts University. Published online
Harvey, M, McMee kin, A. and Warde , A. (2004) Qualities of Food. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Holloway, L., Kneafsey, M., Venn, L., Cox, R., Dowler, E. and Tuomainen, H. (2007) Possible food economies: a methodological framework for exploring food production-consumption relationships, Sociologia Ruralis, 47(1), pp. 1–19.
Knickel, K., Zerge r, C., Jahn, G. and Renting, H. (2008) Limiting and enabling factors in farmers’ collective marketing initiatives: results of a comparative analysis of the situation and trends in ten European countries, Journal of Hunger and Environmental Nutrition, 3 (2/3), pp. 247–269.
Kovách, I. and Kristóf, L. (2009) The role of intermediate actors in transmitting rural goods and services in rural areas under urban pressure, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 11(1), pp. 45–60.
McMichael, P. (2005) Global development and the corporate food regime, in: F.H. Butte l and P. McMichael (eds) New Directions in the Sociology of Global Development, Research in Rural Sociology and Development 11, Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 265–299.
Morgan, K. (2009) Feeding the city: the challenge of urban food planning, International Planning Studies, 14(4), pp. 341–348.
Murdoch, J., Marsde n, T. and Banks, J. (2000) Quality, nature and embeddedness: some theoretical considerations in the context of the food sector, Economic Geography, 76(2), pp. 107–125.
Renting, H. (2008) Collective approach to farmers marketing, eStrategies, May, pp. 102–104.
Renting, H., Marsde n, T. and Banks, J. (2003) Understanding alternative food networks: exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development, Environment and Planning A, 35, pp. 393–411.
Renting, H., Oostindie, H., Laurent, C., Brunori, G., Barjolle, D., Jervell, A., Granbe rg, L. and Heinonen, M. (2008) Multifunctionality of agricultural activities, changing rural identities and new territorial linkages, International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 7(4/5), pp. 361–385.
Renting, H., Rossing, W.A.H., Groot, J.C.J., Ploeg , J.D. van de r, Laurent, C., Perraud, D., Stobbe laar, D.J. and Itte rsum, M.K. van (2009) Exploring multifunctional agriculture: a review of conceptual approaches and prospects for an integrative transitional framework, Journal of Environmental Management, 90(S2), pp. S112–S123.
Roest, K. de and Menghi, A. (2000) Reconsidering ‘traditional’ food: the case of Parmigiano Reggiano cheese, Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4), pp. 439–451.
Svensde n, G. and Soerensen, J. (2007) There’s more to the picture than meets the eye: measuring tangible and intangible capital in two marginal communities in rural Denmark, Journal of Rural Studies, 23(4), pp. 453–471.
Van Huylenbroec k, G. and Durand, G. (2003) Multifunctional Agriculture: A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development. Aldershot: Ashgate.
CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.