Pesticide Use and Risk Perception: An Analysis from the Laboratory Fields
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The central focus of this article is the analysis of farmers’ hybrid local knowledge and their perceptions of risk as they are present in the dynamics of legitimisation of pesticide use -including how it is selected, store, prepared and applied. The case study was situated in a rural area in Southern Brazil, where there is widespread intensive and unsafe use of pesticides in horticultural production. Through the data I question two presuppositions that are common in the literature on pesticide risks. One considers farmers as lacking the correct or sufficient information about health and environmental risks. The other sees farmers as victims of economic constraints, pressure by salespeople, or a ‘technological treadmill’. Without denying the relevance of these arguments, farmers are seen as knowledgeable agents with their own reasons and their own perception of the risks associated with the use of pesticides. I point to a current local knowledge that is a mixture of past and present experiences, resulting from the interface with expert knowledge, exposing a “cognitive dependency” on pesticides. In the conclusions, consideration is given to some implications of this research for the debate on participatory sustainable rural development.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Altieri, Miguel. 1989. Agricultura tradicional. In: Altieri, M. (Org.). Agroecologia. As bases científicas da agricultura alternativa. Rio de Janeiro: PTA-FASE, l989.
---------1990. Why study traditional agriculture? In: Carroll, C., Vandermeer, J. e Rosset, P. (Eds.). Agroecology. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company.
ANVISA, 2003, www.anvisa.gov.br.
Arce, Alberto and Long, Norman.1992. The dynamics of knowledge. Interfaces between bureaucrats and peasants. In Long, N. e Long, A. (eds.), Battlefields of knowledge. The interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development. London: Routledge.
Barrow, C.J. l995. Developing the Environment. Problems & Management. Essex: Longman Scientific & Technical.
Bebbington, Anthony.1994. Theory and relevance in indigenous agriculture: knowledge, agency and organization. In Booth, David (ed.), Rethinking social development. Theory, research and practice. London: Longman.
Beck, Ulrich. l992. Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
---------1999. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bull, David and David Hathaway. 1986. Pragas E Venenos: Agrotóxicos No Brasil E No Terceiro Mundo. Rio De Janeiro: Editora Vozes
Callon, Michel, 1986. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In Law, J. (ed.), Power, action, belief: a new sociology of knowledge?. Sociological Review Monograph 32. London: Routledge.
Chambers, Robert.1983. Rural Development. Putting the Last First. Essex: Longman House.
---------1994. Foreword. In Scoones, I. e Thompson, J. (eds), Beyond farmer first. Rural people’s knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
Cornwall, Andrea, Irene Guijt, and Alice Welbourn.1994. Acknowledging Process: Methodological Challenges For Agricultural Research And Extension. In Scoones, Ian and John Thompson (eds), Beyond farmer first. Rural people’s knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.
Dinham, Barbara (Comp). l993. The Pesticide Hazard. A Global Health and Environmental Audit. London: Zed Books.
Dejours, Christophe. l987. A Loucura do Trabalho. Estudo de Psicopatologia do Trabalho. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
Douglas, Mary l985. Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
---------1994. Risk and Blame. Essays in Cultural Theory. London: Routledge.
FAO, 2003 International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides. www.fao.org/DOCREP/005/Y4544E/y4544e00.htm#Contents
Giddens, Anthony.l990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
---------1991. Modernity And Self-Identity. Self And Society In The Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Guivant, Julia. l992. O Uso de Agrotóxicos e os Problemas de sua Legitimação. Um Estudo de Sociologia Ambiental. PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, São Paulo.
---------1997. ”Heterogeneidade de Conhecimentos no Desenvolvimento Rural Sustentável”. Cadernos “de Ciência E Tecnologia- Embrapa Vol.14, N.3, Set/Dez.: 411-447.
---------1998. “Trajetórias Das Análises De Risco: Da Periferia Ao Centro Da Teoria Social.” Revista De Informações Bibliográficas -Associação Nacional De Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais N.46: 3-38.
---------2000. “Reflexividade na sociedade de risco: conflitos entre leigos e peritos sobre os agrotóxicos.” In Herculano, S. (org.) Qualidade de vida e riscos ambientais. Niteroi: Editora da Universidade Federal Fluminense.
---------2001.”Global food risks: environmental and health risks in Brazil.” In Hogan, Daniel and Maurício Tolmasquim, (eds), Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Brazilian Perspectives. Rio de Janeiro: Brazilian Academy of Sciences.
---------2002a. Heterogeneous and unconventional coalitions around global food risks: integrating Brazil into the debates. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. V.3, n.2: 231-245.
---------2002b Contribuições da sociologia ambiental para os debates sobre desenvolvimento rural sustentável e participativo. Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura. Rio de Janeiro: v.19:72 – 88.
Hannigan, John. 1995. Environmental Sociology. A Social Constructionist Perspective. London: Routledge.
Hayes, W. Jr. and E.Laws, Jr. (eds.). l991. Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology. Vol.1 General Principles. San Diego: Academic Press.
Ilbery, Bryan W. 1985. Agricultural Geography. A Social and Economic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Irwin, Alan 1995. Citizen Science. A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. London: Routledge.
Latour, Bruno,1987. Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Lowe, Philipe; Judy Clark; Susan Seymour and Neil Ward.1997. Moralizing the Environment. Countryside Change, Farming and Pollution. London: University College London Press.
Long, Norman. l992. “From Paradigm Lost to Paradigm Regained? The Case for an Actor-Oriented Sociology of Development.” In Long, Norman and Anne Long (eds.), Battlefields of Knowledge. The Interlocking of Theory and Practice in Social Research and Development. London: Routledge.
Murdoch, Jonhatan e Clark, Judith 1994. Sustainable knowledge. Geoforum, vol.25, N.2: pp.115-132, l994..
National Research Council.1993. Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Ploeg, Jan Dowe Van der. l993a. “Potatoes and knowledge.” In Hobart, L. Harmon (ed.), An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance. London: Routledge.
---------1993b. Rural sociology and the new agrarian question: A perspective from The Netherlands. Sociologia Ruralis 33(2):240-260.
Powell, Douglas and Leiss, William 1997. Mad cows and mother’s milk. The perils of poor risk communication. Quebec: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Pretty, Jules. 1995. Regenerating Agriculture. Policies and Practice for Sustainability and Self-reliance. London: Earthscan Publications.
Reijntjes, Coen, Bertus Haverkort e Ann Waters-Bayer. 1992. Farming for the Future. An Introduction to Low-External-Input and Sustainable Agriculture. London: The Macmillan Press.
Renn, Ortwin. l991 "Risk Perception and Risk Management: a Review", CENTED, Clark University, Nº85: 1-9.
Rogers, Everett. 1981. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.
Slovic, Paul. l985 "Informing and Educating the Public about Risk", Decision Research Report 5 (no reference of publication place).
Sweet, Robert, J.Dewey, D.Lisk, W.Mullison, D.Rutz E W.Smith. (1990), Pesticides And Safety Of Fruits And Vegetables. Iowa: Council For Agricultural Science And Technology.
Ward, Neil.l993.“The agricultural treadmill and the rural environment in the post-productivist era.” Sociologia Ruralis Vol.33 (3/4):348-364.
---------1995. Technological change and the regulation of pollution from agricultural pesticides. Geoforum, Vol.26.
World Bank, 2004, http://econ.worldbank.org/view.php?id=11803.
Wynne, Brian. l996. “May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide.” In Lash, Scott, Bronislaw Szerszynski and Brain Wynne (eds.) Risk, Environment and Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.