Visiting a Farm: An Exploratory Study of the Social Construction of Animal Farming in Norway and the Netherlands Based on Sensory Perception

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jan 4, 2010
B.K. Boogaard B.B. Bock S.J. Oosting E. Kroch

Abstract

Most citizens in modern societies have little personal knowledge or experience of animal farming. This study explores the social construction of animal farming by studying how citizens perceive and evaluate modern farming after visiting a farm in real life. We wanted to understand how (non-farming) citizens develop an opinion of modern dairy farming when experiencing dairy farming in real life and practice, and how they translate what they see, smell and feel into an evaluative perception and mental image. We therefore conducted dairy farm visits with citizen panels in Norway and the Netherlands and asked the panel members to register what they saw, heard, smelled and felt and what they appreciated (or not) on the farm. The aspects that respondents registered could be grouped into four themes: the animals and their products, the rural landscape, farm practices and the farmer. When respondents described their experiences of these aspects on a specific farm, they appeared to look at them from three angles: modernity, tradition and naturality. Most respondents wanted farms to be modern, traditional as well as natural, but they were ready to negotiate and to accept compromises. Many respondents considered the farmer to be responsible for reconciling modernity, tradition and naturality. By taking different topics and issues into account and looking at animal farms from multiple angles, the respondents’ developed a balanced and nuanced opinion of animal farming. The image that they constructed was not dualistic (arcadia versus factory) but pluralistic, thus at the same time more complex but also more flexible than expected. We expect that the development of a pluralistic image and balanced opinion was facilitated through the direct experience of dairy farming and farm life.

The article starts with a theoretical analysis and aims to contribute to recent debates in rural sociology in two ways: 1) it studies how material experience and mental perception interact in the construction of an evaluative image of animal farming; and 2) it explores the social construction of animal farming as embedded into to the construction of nature, rurality and human-animal relationships. It concludes by discussing the contribution of the findings to the ongoing theoretical debate in this field.

How to Cite

[1]
Boogaard, B. , Bock, .B. , Oosting, S. and Kroch, E. 2010. Visiting a Farm: An Exploratory Study of the Social Construction of Animal Farming in Norway and the Netherlands Based on Sensory Perception . The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food. 17, 1 (Jan. 2010), 24-50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.48416/ijsaf.v17i1.266.
Abstract 36 | PDF Downloads 25

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

References
ATLAS.ti (2006) The Qualtative Data Analysis Software. Published online .
BARNETT, C. (1998) The cultural turn: fashion or progress in human geography?, Antipode, 30(4), pp. 379–394.
BELL, D. (2006) Variations on the rural idyll, in: P.J. CLOKE and T. MARSDEN (eds) Handbook of Rural Studies, London: Sage Publications.
BERGER, P.L. and LUCKMANN, T. (1967) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.
New York: Anchor.
BOGHOSSIAN, P.A. (2001) What is social construction?, Times Literary Supplement, 23 February 2001, pp. 6–8.
BOOGAARD, B.K., OOSTING, S.J. and BOCK, B.B. (2006) Elements of societal perception of farm animal welfare: a quantitative study in the Netherlands, Livestock Science, 104(1–2), pp. 13–22.
BULLER, H. (2004) Where the wild things are: the evolving iconography of rural fauna, Journal of Rural Studies, 20(2), pp. 131–141.
BULLER, H. and MORRIS, C. (2003) Farm animal welfare: a new repertoire of nature-society relations or modernism
re-embedded?, Sociologia Ruralis, 43(3), pp. 216–237.
BUNCE, M. (2003) Reproducing rural idylls, in: P. CLOKE (ed.) Country Visions, Harlow: Pearson Education.
CALLON, M., LASCOUMES, P. and BARTHE, Y. (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy.
Londen: MiT Press.
CAROLAN, M.S. (2007) introducing the concept of tactile space: creating lasting social and environmental commitments, Geoforum, 38(6), pp. 1264–1275.
CAROLAN, M.S. (2008) More-than-representational knowledge/s of the countryside: how we think as bodies, Sociologia Ruralis, 48(4), pp. 408–422.
CASTREE, N. and BRAUN, B. (2006) constructing rural natures, in: P.J. CLOKE and T. MARSDEN (eds) Handbook of Rural Studies, London: Sage Publications.
CBS (CENTRAAL BUREAU VOOR DE STATISTIEK) (2007) Statline. Published online .
CLOKE, P. (1997) country backwater to virtual village? Rural studies and ‘the cultural turn’, Journal of Rural Studies, 13(4), pp. 367–375.
CLOKE, P. (2003) Knowing ruralities?, in: P. CLOKE (ed.) Country Visions, Harlow: Pearson Education.
CLOKE, P. (2006) conceptualizing rurality, in: P.J. CLOKE and T. MARSDEN (eds) Handbook of Rural Studies, London: Sage Publications.
CROSSLEY, N. (2005) Sociology and the body, in: C. CALHOUN, C. ROJEK and B. TURNER (eds) The Sage Handbook of Sociology, London: Sage Publications.
dAUGSTAD, K., RØNNINGEN, K. and SKAR, B. (2006) Agriculture as an upholder of cultural heritage? conceptualizations
and value judgements – a Norwegian perspective in international context, Journal of Rural Studies, 22(1), pp. 67–81.
DEMERITT, D. (2002) What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique, Progress in Human Geography, 26(6), pp. 767–790.
EDER, K. (1996) The Social Construction of Nature: A Sociology of Ecological Enlightenment. London: Sage Publications.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2005) “Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals” Special Eurobarometer 229
FRANKLIN, A. (1999) Animals and Modern Cultures: A Sociology of Human-animal Relations in Modernity. London: Sage Publications.
FRASER, D. (2001) The ‘new perception’ of animal agriculture: legless cows, featherless chickens, and a need for genuine analysis, Journal of Animal Science, 79(3), pp. 634–641.
FROUWS, J. (1998) The contested redefinition of the countryside: an analysis of rural discourses in the Netherlands, Sociologia Ruralis, 38(1), pp. 21–68.
GLASS, C.A., HUTCHINSON, W.G. and BEATTIE, V.E. (2005) Measuring the value to the public of pig welfare improvements: a contingent valuation approach, Animal Welfare, 14(1), pp. 61–69.
GREIDER, T. and GARKOVICH, L. (1994) Landscapes: the social construction of nature and the environment, Rural Sociology, 59(1), pp. 1–24.
GULLESTAD, M. (1992) Peace and quiet, in: The Art of Social Relations: Essays on Culture, Social Action and Everyday Life in Modern Norway, Kristiansand: Scandinavian University Press, pp. 137–164.
HAARTSEN, T., HUIGEN, P.P.P. and GROOTE, P. (2003) Rural areas in the Netherlands, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 94(1), pp. 129–136.
HOLLOWAY, L. (2004) Showing and telling farming: agricultural shows and re-imaging British agriculture, Journal of Rural Studies, 20(3), pp. 319–330.
HOLLOWAY, L. (2007) Subjecting cows to robots: farming technologies and the making of animal subjects, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(6), pp. 1041–1060.
HORTON, J. (2003) different genres, different visions? The changing countryside in postwar British children's literature, in: P. CLOKE (ed.) Country Visions, Harlow: Pearson Education.
JONES, O. (2006) Non-human rural studies, in: P.J. CLOKE and T. MARSDEN (eds) Handbook of Rural Studies, London: Sage Publications.
KROGH, E. (1995) Landskapets fenomenologi. Ph.d. dissertation, Agricultural University of Norway, Ås.
KROGH, E. and CLEMENTSEN, M. (2004) Cultural-landscaping: Creating a Desired Identity? Paper presented at the Xi World congress of Rural Sociology, Trondheim, Norway, 25–30 July.
MACNAGHTEN, P. (2004) Animals in their nature: a case study on public attitudes to animals, genetic modification and ‘nature’, Sociology, 38(3), pp. 533–551.
MACNAGHTEN, P. (2006) Nature, Theory, Culture and Society, 23(2–3), pp. 347–349.
MACNAGHTEN, P. and URRY, J. (1998) Contested Natures, London: Sage Publications.
MARÍA, G.A. (2006) Public perception of farm animal welfare in Spain, Livestock Science, 103(3), pp. 250–256.
MERLEAU-PONTY, M. (1970) Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
MORRIS, C. and EVANS, N. (2004) Agricultural turns, geographical turns: retrospect and prospect, Journal of Rural Studies, 20(1), pp. 95–111.
NYGARD, B. and STORSTAD, O. (1998) de-globalization of food markets? consumer perceptions of safe food: the case of Norway, Sociologia Ruralis, 38(1), pp. 35–53.
PHILO, C. (2000) More words, more worlds: reflections on the ‘cultural turn’ and human geography, in: I. COOK, D. CROUCH, S. NAYLOR and R. RYAN (eds) Cultural Turns/Geographical Turns: Perspectives on Cultural Geography, Harlow: Prentice Hall.
SSB (STATISTIC SENTRALBYRÅ) (2007) Statbank. Published online .
SHORT, J.R. (1991) Imagined Country: Environment, Culture and Society. London: Routledge.
SHORT, B. (2006) idyllic ruralities, in: P.J. CLOKE and T. MARSDEN (eds) Handbook of Rural Studies, London: Sage Publications.
SISMONDO, S. (1993) Some social constructions, Social Studies of Science, 23(3), pp. 515–553.
STORSTAD, O. and BJØRKHAUG, H. (2003) Foundations of production and consumption of organic food in Norway: common attitudes among farmers and consumers?, Agriculture and Human Values, 20(2), pp.151–163.
TOVEY, H. (2003) Theorising nature and society in sociology: the invisibility of animals, Sociologia Ruralis, 43(3), pp. 196–215.
VAN DER ZIEL, T. and STEENBEKKERS, A. (2006) Leven zonder drukte. Wat stedelingen waarderen in het platteland.
den Haag: Sociaal en cultureel Planbureau.
VAN KOPPEN, C.S.A. (2000) Resource, Arcadia, lifeworld: nature concepts in environmental sociology, Sociologia Ruralis, 40(3), pp. 300–318.
VAN KOPPEN, C.S.A. (2002) Echte natuur. Een sociaaltheoretisch onderzoek naar natuurwaardering en natuurbescherming
in de moderne samenleving. Ph.d. dissertation. Wageningen University.
VIHINEN, H. (2001) Recognising Choice: A Study of the Changing Politics of the Common Agricultural Policy through an Analysis of the Macsharry Reform Debate in Ireland and the Netherlands. Ph.d. dissertation, University of Helsinki.
WILKIE, R. (2005) Sentient commodities and productive paradoxes: the ambiguous nature of human-livestock relations in northeast Scotland, Journal of Rural Studies, 21(2), pp. 213–230.
YARWOOD, R. and EVANS, N. (2000) Taking stock of farm animals and rurality, in: C. PHILO and C. WILBERT (eds) Animals Spaces, Beastly Places, London: Routledge.
Section
Articles