Quality, Coherence and Co-operation:A Framework for Studying the Mediation of Qualities in Food Networks and Collective Marketing Strategies
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Abstract
The aim of this article is to present an analytical framework to examine how qualities are mediated between producers and consumers, and how this is linked to the way the food chain is constructed, who is involved, and the way the market is developed. The framework is a reorientation to see food networks as consisting of triadic value relations that transform and mediate qualities through the chain, using an analytical typology of quality dimensions. From this perspective, a meta-analysis of case reports from collective farmers’ marketing initiatives in Europe has been performed. The cases differ greatly in the number of quality dimensions involved, and they represent very different strategies to mediate the qualities from field to table. We find that the performance of the marketing strategy is related to coherence in terms of whether the individual value relations are able to carry the involved quality dimensions throughout the whole network. In conclusion, this framework is a promising tool to radicalize our understanding of how qualities are mediated through food networks.
How to Cite
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Alrøe, H.F. and Noe, E. (2008) What makes organic agriculture move – protest, meaning or market? A polyocular approach to the dynamics and governance of organic agriculture, International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 7(1/2), pp. 5–22.
Assouline, G. (2007) National Synthesis Report on Case Studies in France, COFAMI-project. Published online
Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. (1999) The sociology of critical capacity, European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), pp. 359–377.
Brunori, G. (2007) Local food and alternative food networks: a communication perspective, Anthropology of Food, S2, March 2007, published online
Callon, M., Méadel, C. and Rab eha risoa, V. (2002) The economy of qualities, Economy and Society, 31(2), pp. 194–217.
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A. and Rouleau, L. (2007) Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: rethinking theoretical frames, Human Relations, 60(1), pp. 179–215.
Glover, D. (ed.) (2003) Lila’s Child: An Inquiry into Quality. Fairfield, CA: 1st Books Library.
Goodma n, D. (2001) Ontology matters: the relational materiality of nature and agro-food studies, Sociologia Ruralis, 41(1), pp. 1–19.
Goodma n, D. (2003) The quality ’turn’ and alternative food practises: reflections and agenda, Journal of Rural Studies, 19, pp. 1–7.
Holloway, L., Kneaf sey, M., Venn, L., Cox, R., Dowler, E. and Tuoma inen, H. (2007) Possible food economies: a methodological framework for exploring food production-consumption relationships, Sociologia Ruralis, 47(1), pp. 1–19.
Kalnina, A., Šuma ne, S. and Tisenkopfs, T. (2007) National Synthesis Report on Case Studies in Latvia, COFAMI-project. Published online
Lock ie, S. and Kitto, S. (2000) Beyond the farm gate: production-consumption networks and agri-food research, Sociologia Ruralis, 40(1), pp. 3–19.
Mansfield, B. (2003) Fish, factory trawlers and imitation crab: the nature of quality in the seafood industry, Journal of Rural Studies, 19, pp. 9–21.
Marsden, T. (2000) Food matters and the matters of food, Sociologia Ruralis, 40(1), pp. 20–29.
Murdoch , J. and Miele, M. (2004) Culinary networks and cultural connections: a conventions perspective, in: A. Huges and S. Reimer (eds) Geographies of Commodity Chains, London: Routledge, pp. 102–119.
Noe, E. (2006) The paradox of diffusion of organic farming: a case study in Denmark, in: G. Holt and M. Reed (eds) Sociological Perspectives of Organic Agriculture: From Pioneer to Policy, Wallingford: CABI, pp. 210–226.
Noe, E. (2007) National Synthesis Report on Case Studies in Denmark, COFAMI-project. Published online
Noe, E. and Alrøe, H.F. (2006) Combining Luhmann and actor-network theory to see farm enterprises as self-organizing systems, Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 13(1), pp. 34–48.
Noe, E., Alrøe, H.F. and Langvad, A.M.S. (2008) A polyocular framework for research on multifunctional farming and rural development, Sociologia Ruralis, 48(1), pp. 1–15.
Oostindie, H., Renting, H. and Meulen, H. van der (2007) National Synthesis Report on Case Studies in Netherlands, COFAMI-project. Published online
Peirce, C.S. (1931–1958) Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vols. 1–6, 1931–1935, Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (eds), vols. 7–8, 1958, Arthur W. Burks (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pirsig, R.M. (1991) Lila: An Inquiry into Morals, New York: Bantam Books.
Pirsig, R.M. (1999) Subjects, objects, data and values, in: D. Aerts, J. Broeka ert and E. Mathijs (eds) Einstein Meets Magritte – An Interdisciplinary Reflection: The White Book of ‘Einstein Meets Magritte’, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 79–98.
Ponte, S. and Gibb on, P. (2005) Quality standards, conventions and the governance of global value chains, Economy and Society, 34(1), pp. 1–31.
Renard, M.-C. (2003) Fair trade: quality, market and conventions, Journal of Rural Studies, 19, pp. 87–96.
Roest, K. de, Montanari, C. and Cerruti, R. (2007) National Synthesis Report on Case Studies in Italy, COFAMI-project. Published online
Sanders, J. and Mosch itz, H. (2007) National Synthesis Report on Case Studies in Switzerland, COFAMI-project. Published online
Schermer, M. and Rieder, E. (2007) National Synthesis Report on Case Studies in Austria, COFAMI-project. Published online
Sonnino, R. and Marsden, T. (2006) Beyond the divide: rethinking relationships between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe, Journal of Economic Geography, 6, pp. 181–199.
Stræte, E.P. (2008) Modes of qualities in development of specialty food, British Food Journal, 110(1), pp. 62–75.
Thévenot, L. (2002) Conventions of co-ordination and the framing of uncertainty, in: E. Fullbrook (ed.) Intersubjectivity in Economics, London: Routledge, pp. 181–197.
CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.